HFCS Award |
| Best Overlooked Film |
| Date | Area | Gross |
|---|---|---|
| 21 February 2016 | USA | USD 1,512,815 |
| 7 February 2016 | USA | USD 1,397,284 |
| 31 January 2016 | USA | USD 835,572 |
| Date | Area | Gross | Screens |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 January 2016 | USA | USD 803,000 | 1210 |
| 31 January 2016 | USA | USD 835,572 | 1,210 |
| Date | Area | Gross | Screens |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 February 2016 | USA | USD 1,012 | 6 |
| 7 February 2016 | USA | USD 137,523 | 1,031 |
| 31 January 2016 | USA | USD 835,572 | 1,210 |
'JANE GOT A GUN': Three Stars (Out of Five)Natalie Portman's triumphant return to the big screen (or so it first seems), is (the lead) in this western-action flick! She plays a wife, desperately trying to defend her outlaw husband, from his vengeful old gang with the help of her former fiancé.
I don't mean to spoil the movie but blowing up all the bad guys and shooting them when they're on fire is sort of a deus ex machina ending.
It's not a 'bad' film, it's just not much of anything. Reading the production issues suggests the film had the potential to be much more before key people abandoned the project.
This movie is awful, boring, and emotionless with no redeeming qualities. Natalie Portman's vanity project that she produced turns into a slow, grueling Western that took an effort to sit through.
Natalie Portman is among the few actresses that can easily adapt and "wear" a role, a character, no matter how different this is from a previous one, no matter how all these characters she has played contradict one another. Natalie Portman always manages to become, the one we watch on the big screen, like she is the one truly.
A Gem hidden in the pile of filmsPrior seeing the film, I didn't even think that this movie would make me think about the "Quick and the Dead". Then I saw "Jane With A Gun" last night, and I thought this film might be Natalie Portman's best performance of her career.
Because Blockbuster video had a section titled "Westerns" people seem to have come to the expectation that anything taking place during the 1800's has to follow a certain formula, centering around gunfights. But really, "Western" is more a category for it's time placement, which can fall into different genres.
I was unpleasantly surprised by the bad reviews that Jane Got a Gun has received in the US by "experts". I'm a fan of Western movies and was delighted by the high quality of this film.
This move is awful it is so bad it will soon be forgotten Natalie P and the other actors were not he problem Micheal F was smart to drop the film as an actor myself we know the director is important as the writer as the producer as the cast editors etc.
