Gregory Bateson

4/5

Biography

Gregory Bateson (9 May 1904 – 4 July 1980) was an English anthropologist, social scientist, linguist, visual anthropologist, semiotician and cyberneticist whose work intersected that of many other fields. He had a natural ability to recognize order and pattern in the universe. In the 1940s he helped extend systems theory/cybernetics to the social/behavioral sciences, and spent the last decade of his life developing a "meta-science" of epistemology to bring together the various early forms of systems theory developing in various fields of science. Some of his most noted writings are to be found in his books, Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1972) and Mind and Nature (1979). Angels Fear (published posthumously in 1987) was co-authored by his daughter Mary Catherine Bateson.

  • Primary profession
  • Director·cinematographer·miscellaneous
  • Country
  • United States
  • Nationality
  • American
  • Gender
  • Male
  • Birth date
  • 09 May 1904
  • Place of birth
  • Grantchester
  • Death date
  • 1980-07-04
  • Death age
  • 76
  • Place of death
  • San Francisco
  • Children
  • Mary Catherine Bateson
  • Spouses
  • Margaret Mead
  • Education
  • St John's College· Cambridge·Charterhouse School·University of Cambridge
  • Member of
  • American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • Parents
  • William Bateson

Music

Movies

Books

Awards

Trivia

Anthropologist, Social Scientist, Cyberneticist.

Wrote two famous books: Steps to an Ecology of Mind, and Mind & Nature.

With Don Jackson and John Weakland, the three became know as the "Palo Alto Group" and founded MRI (Mental Research Institute).

Gregory Batesons MRI coined the term "Dysfunctional Family" in the 1950s to describe the cause of schizophrenia but ultimately this theory was found to be erroneous.

Quotes

Rigor alone is paralytic death, but imagination alone is insanity.

by reports of their internal and external relations and interactions).

The rules of the universe that we think we know are buried deep in our processes of perception.

Earlier fundamental work of Whitehead, Russell, Wittgenstein, Carnap, Whorf, etc.

as well as my own attempt to use this earlier thinking as an epistemological base for psychiatric theory, led to a series of generalizations: That human verbal communication can operate and always does operate at many contrasting levels of abstraction. These range in two directions from the seemingly simple denotative level (“The cat is on the mat”). One range or set of these more abstract levels includes those explicit or implicit messages where the subject of discourse is the language. We will call these metalinguistic (for example, “The verbal sound ‘cat’ stands for any member of such and such class of objects”, or “The word, ‘cat’ has no fur and cannot scratch”). The other set of levels of abstraction we will call metacommunicative (e. g.

“My telling you where to find the cat was friendly”, or “This is play”). In these, the subject of discourse is the relationship between the speakers. It will be noted that the vast majority of both metalinguistic and metacommunicative messages remain implicit; and also that, especially in the psychiatric interview, there occurs a further class of implicit messages about how metacommunicative messages of friendship and hostility are to be interpreted.

We are beginning to play with ideas of ecology, and although we immediately trivialize these into commerce or politics, there is at least an impulse still in the human breast to unify and thereby sanctify the total natural world, of which we are. . . . There have been, and still are, in the world many different and even contrasting epistemologies which have been alike in stressing an ultimate unity, and, although this is less sure, which have also stressed the notion that ultimate unity is aesthetic. The uniformity of these views gives hope that perhaps the great authority of quantitative science may be insufficient to deny an ultimate unifying beauty. I hold to the presupposition that our loss of the sense of aesthetic unity was, quite simply, an epistemological mistake.

Whatever the ups and downs of detail within our limited experience the larger whole is primarily beautiful.

Language commonly stresses only one side of any interaction.

Science, like art, religion, commerce, warfare, and even sleep, is based on presuppositions.

In the transmission of human culture, people always attempt to replicate, to pass on to the next generation the skills and values of the parents, but the attempt always fails because cultural transmission is geared to learning, not DNA.

All experience is subjective.

Official education was telling people almost nothing of the nature of all those things on the seashores, and in the redwood forests, in the deserts and in the plains. .

Comments