Canadian Cinema Editors Award |
Best Editing in Television Movie or Mini-Series |
DGC Team Award |
Direction - Television Movie/Mini-Series |
Television Movie/Mini-Series |
Leo |
Best Cinematography in a Feature Length Drama |
Best Direction in a Feature Length Drama |
Best Feature Length Drama |
Best Picture Editing in a Feature Length Drama |
Best Production Design in a Feature Length Drama |
This is a Lifetime docudrama of JK Rowland's life leading up to the big success of Harry Potter. Is it factual?
It's hard to fault a movie when its based on fact, and so very accurate at that. Having researched JK Rowling before watching this movie to verify the authenticity of this film, it was rather accurate in its presentation.
Reviews can be considered an interesting exercise for the ego. After all, what are we criticising?
OK viewing for a damp winters day when there is nothing else on the box and your DVD player is on the blink. Research is laughable (if it was done at all) Knowing Tutshill, having attended Wyedean and having worked in Edinburgh, this film shows the typical sickly sweet idealistic old fashioned chocolate box view of "little old England" (but at least they recognised that Edinburgh is in Scotland).
This film is so lazy, the research is 100% Wikipedia and is laugh out loud funny for its inaccurate portrayal of Rowling's village (Tutshill), the School and, best of all - the utterly weird thing about the candy trolley on the train.....a hurricane of laughter that one.
This made for television feature caught and held the attention one New Year afternoon for all the wrong reasons. A dramatisation of how Joanne Rowling discovered the idea for Harry Potter then became JK and rose to international fame is filmed like a particularly cheap perfume ad.
I loved Poppy Montgomery acting, but I think they got J.K's personality all wrong.
As a former Wyedean student I'm not sure where to even start... The entire film is just shockingly researched from start to finish.
I can only concur with the comments made previously about the glaring misrepresentations of British life and culture in this film. I appreciate that biopics are an interpretation of a person's life, but while that person is still alive some efforts should at least be made to show their nation's culture with some semblance of authenticity.