Charles Darwin

3/5

Biography

British naturalist who convinced the scientific community of the occurrence of evolution and who proposed the theory that this could be explained through natural and sexual selection. He was born 12 February 1809 in Mount House, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England, UK and died 19 April 1882 in Down House, Downe, Kent, England, UK.

  • Real name
  • Charles Robert Darwin
  • Name variations
  • Darwin
  • Active years
  • 73
  • Primary profession
  • Miscellaneous·actor
  • Country
  • United Kingdom
  • Nationality
  • British
  • Gender
  • Male
  • Birth date
  • 12 February 1809
  • Place of birth
  • The Mount· Shrewsbury
  • Death date
  • 1882-04-19
  • Death age
  • 73
  • Place of death
  • Down House
  • Residence
  • The Mount· Shrewsbury
  • Children
  • ·Leonard Darwin·George Darwin·William Erasmus Darwin·Anne Darwin·Horace Darwin·Charles Waring Darwin·Francis Darwin·
  • Spouses
  • Emma Darwin
  • Education
  • University of Cambridge·University of Edinburgh Medical School·Shrewsbury School·Christ's College· Cambridge
  • Knows language
  • English language
  • Member of
  • Silesian Society for Patriotic Culture·Academy of Sciences of Turin·Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences·Russian Academy of Sciences·Academy of Sciences Leopoldina·Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences·Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities·Hungarian Academy of Sciences·Prussian Academy of Sciences·Royal Geographical Society·American Philosophical Society·Accademia dei Lincei·American Academy of Arts and Sciences·French Academy of Sciences
  • Parents
  • Robert Darwin·
  • Influence
  • Thomas Robert Malthus·Alfred Russel Wallace·John Tyndall·John Lubbock·Herbert Spencer·Carl Linnaeus·Oscar Hertwig·Sigmund Freud·Josiah Wedgwood·Charles Lyell·John Herschel·Jean-Baptiste Lamarck·Alexander von Humboldt·Francis Galton·Thomas Henry Huxley·

Music

Movies

Books

Awards

Trivia

Was a staunch and outspoken opponent of the slave trade.

His father didnt approve of his interest in biology at all and tried to talk him out of joining the H.M.S. Beagle voyage, and told him outright that he was a disappointment when he was an adolescent, although he later changed his mind and financially supported Charles so that he could work as an independent gentleman-scientist.

In his later years at Down House, he installed a mirror in his garden so that he could see when people were coming up the road and retire unnoticed.

First conceived of genetic evolution from observing species on the Galapagos Islands while on a voyage on the H.M.S. Beagle.

Was not an especially good student in school and was known to be quite lazy, having more interest in fox hunting than studying. This led to him flunking medical school.

His interest in biology was sparked by his mentor, John S. Henlow.

His other book The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms sold more copies than On the Origin of Species when first released.

Although he spent much of his later life being attacked by religious figures, he originally trained to be a clergyman.

Had a fear of blood, which was one of his reasons for failing medical school.

His grandfather was Dr. Erasmus Darwin, Britains most renowned physician of the 18th century, and a brilliant scientist and poet in his own right, and a member of the Lunar Society, which met on the nights of the full moon so that its members could travel to the meetings in relative safety, which boasted such luminaries as James Watt, developer of Steam Engines and the reason why the unit of electricity is called a watt, and Joseph Priestley, generally credited with the discovery of oxygen.

His wife was his first cousin. Her paternal grandfather was the founder of the Josiah Wedgwood and Sons pottery firm.

Born on the same day as Abraham Lincoln.

The father of William Erasmus Darwin (27 December 1839 - 8 September 1914), Anne Elizabeth Darwin (2 March 1841 - 23 April 1851), Mary Eleanor Darwin (23 September 1842 - 16 October 1842), Henrietta Emma "Etty" Darwin (25 September 1843 - 17 December 1927), George Howard Darwin (9 July 1845 - 7 December 1912), Elizabeth "Bessy" Darwin (8 July 1847 - 8 June 1926), Francis Darwin (16 August 1848 - 19 September 1925), Leonard Darwin (15 January 1850 - 26 March 1943), Horace Darwin (13 May 1851 - 29 September 1928), & Charles Waring Darwin (6 December 1856 - 28 June 1858).

Quotes

[in 1869, about his book "The Origin of Species"] I see no good reasons,why the views given in this volume should shock the religious,sensibilities of anyone.

[from other his major work, "The Descent of Man"] Man is descended from,a hairy, tailed quadruped.

If I had my life to live over again, I would have made a rule to read some poetry and listen to some music at least once every week.

A man who dares to waste one hour of time has not discovered the value of life.

Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence, do little harm, for everyone takes a salutary pleasure in proving their falseness; and when this is done, one path towards error is closed and the road to truth is often at the same time opened.

We are not here concerned with hopes or fears, only with truth as far as our reason permits us to discover it.

The limit of man s knowledge in any subject possesses a high interest which is perhaps increased by its close neighbourhood to the realms of imagination.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.

One general law, leading to the advancement of all organic beings, namely, multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.

The following proposition seems to me in a high degree probable—namely, that any animal whatever, endowed with well-marked social instincts, the parental and filial affections being here included, would inevitably acquire a moral sense or conscience, as soon as its intellectual powers had become as well, or nearly as well developed, as in man. For, firstly, the social instincts lead an animal to take pleasure in the society of its fellows, to feel a certain amount of sympathy with them, and to perform various services for them.

We can allow satellites, planets, suns, universe, nay whole systems of universe, to be governed by laws, but the smallest insect, we wish to be created at once by special act.

Nothing is easier than to admit in words the truth of the universal struggle for life, or more difficult--at least I have found it so--than constantly to bear this conclusion in mind.

To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree. . . The difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection , though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered subversive of the theory.

One day, on tearing off some old bark, I saw two rare beetles, and seized one in each hand. Then I saw a third and new kind, which I could not bear to lose, so I popped the one which I held in my right hand into my mouth. Alas! it ejected some intensely acrid fluid, which burnt my tongue so that I was forced to spit the beetle out, which was lost, as was the third one.

If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.

A grain in the balance will determine which individual shall live and which shall die - which variety or species shall increase in number, and which shall decrease, or finally become extinct.

. . . Whilst on board the Beagle I was quite orthodox, and I remember being heartily laughed at by several of the officers. . . for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some point of morality. . . But I had gradually come by this time, i. e.

1836 to 1839, to see that the Old Testament from its manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, the rainbow at sign, &c.

&c.

and from its attributing to God the feelings of a revengeful tyrant, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos, or the beliefs of any barbarian. . . . By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, (and that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become), that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost uncomprehensible by us, that the Gospels cannot be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, that they differ in many important details, far too important, as it seemed to me, to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitnesses; by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation. The fact that many false religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wild-fire had some weight with me. Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can be hardly denied that its perfection depends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories. But I was very unwilling to give up my belief. . . Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct. I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all of my friends, will be everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine.

Blushing is the most peculiar and most human of all expressions.

None can reply - all seems eternal now. The wilderness has a mysterious tongue, which teaches awful doubt.

When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Cambrian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled.

But then arises the doubt, can the mind of man, which has, as I fully believe been developed from a mind as low as that possessed by the lowest animal, be trusted when it draws such grand conclusions?,If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin.

Man with all his noble qualities, with sympathy which feels for the most debased, with benevolence which extends not only to other men but to the humblest living creature, with his god-like intellect which has penetrated into the movements and constitution of the solar system—with all these exalted powers—Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.

In the future I see open fields for more important researches. Psychology will be securely based on the foundation already laid by Mr. Herbert Spencer, that of the necessary acquirement of each mental power and capacity by graduation.

In the distant future I see open fields for far more important researches. Psychology will be based on a new foundation, that of the necessary acquirement of each mental power and capacity by gradation. Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history.

For my own part I would as soon be descended from that heroic little monkey, who braved his dreaded enemy in order to save the life of his keeper; or from that old baboon, who, descending from the mountains, carried away in triumph his young comrade from a crowd of astonished dogs—as from a savage who delights to torture his enemies, offers up bloody sacrifices, practices infanticide without remorse, treats his wives like slaves, knows no decency, and is haunted by the grossest superstitions.

But when on shore, & wandering in the sublime forests, surrounded by views more gorgeous than even Claude ever imagined, I enjoy a delight which none but those who have experienced it can understand - If it is to be done, it must be by studying Humboldt.

There are several other sources of enjoyment in a long voyage, which are of a more reasonable nature. The map of the world ceases to be a blank; it becomes a picture full of the most varied and animated figures. Each part assumes its proper dimensions: continents are not looked at in the light of islands, or islands considered as mere specks, which are, in truth, larger than many kingdoms of Europe. Africa, or North and South America, are well-sounding names, and easily pronounced; but it is not until having sailed for weeks along small portions of their shores, that one is thoroughly convinced what vast spaces on our immense world these names imply.

It is necessary to look forward to a harvest, however distant that may be, when some fruit will be reaped, some good effected.

A moral being is one who is capable of reflecting on his past actions and their motives—of approving of some and disapproving of others.

It may be worth while to illustrate this view of classification, by taking the case of languages. If we possessed a perfect pedigree of mankind, a genealogical arrangement of the races of man would afford the best classification of the various languages now spoken throughout the world; and if all extinct languages, and all intermediate and slowly changing dialects, were to be included, such an arrangement would be the only possible one. Yet it might be that some ancient languages had altered very little and had given rise to few new languages, whilst others had altered much owing to the spreading, isolation, and state of civilisation of the several co-descended races, and had thus given rise to many new dialects and languages. The various degrees of difference between the languages of the same stock, would have to be expressed by groups subordinate to groups; but the proper or even the only possible arrangement would still be genealogical; and this would be strictly natural, as it would connect together all languages, extinct and recent, by the closest affinities, and would give the filiation and origin of each tongue.

But I am very poorly today & very stupid & I hate everybody & everything. One lives only to make blunders.

Besides love and sympathy, animals exhibit other qualities connected with the social instincts which in us would be called moral.

It is always advisable to perceive clearly our ignorance.

The loss of these tastes [for poetry and music] is a loss of happiness, and may possibly be injurious to the intellect, and more probably to the moral character, by enfeebling the emotional part of our nature.

As the great botanist Bichat long ago said, if everyone were cast in the same mould, there would be no such thing as beauty. If all our women were to become as beautiful as the Venus de’ Medici, we should for a time be charmed; but we should soon wish for variety; and as soon as we had obtained variety, we should wish to see certain characteristics in our women a little exaggerated beyond the then existing common standard.

Nothing at first can appear more difficult to believe than that the more complex organs and instincts should have been perfected, not by means superior to, though analogous with, human reason, but by the accumulation of innumerable slight variations, each good for the individual possessor. Nevertheless, this difficulty, though appearing to our imagination insuperably great, cannot be considered real if we admit the following propositions, namely,— that gradations in the perfection of any organ or instinct, which we may consider, either do now exist or could have existed, each good of its kind,— that all organs and instincts are, in ever so slight a degree, variable,— and, lastly, that there is a struggle for existence leading to the preservation of each profitable deviation of structure or instinct. The truth of these propositions cannot, I think, be disputed.

He who believes that each being has been created as we now see it, must occasionally have felt surprise when he has met with an animal having habits and structure not at all in agreement.

Origin of man now proved. —Metaphysics must flourish. —He who understands baboon would do more towards metaphysics than Locke.

But just in proportion as this process of extermination has acted on an enormous scale, so must the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed, be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record.

When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled.

There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

If about a dozen genera of birds had become extinct or were unknown, who would have ventured to have surmised that birds might have existed which used their wings solely as flappers, like the logger-headed duck (Micropterus of Eyton); as fins in the water and front legs on the land, like the penguin; as sails, like the ostrich; and functionally for no purpose, like the Apteryx. Yet the structure of each of these birds is good for it, under the conditions of life to which it is exposed, for each has to live by a struggle; but it is not necessarily the best possible under all possible conditions. It must not be inferred from these remarks that any of the grades of wing-structure here alluded to, which perhaps may all have resulted from disuse, indicate the natural steps by which birds have acquired their perfect power of flight; but they serve, at least, to show what diversified means of transition are possible.

There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.

The expression often used by Mr. Herbert Spencer of the Survival of the Fittest is more accurate, and is sometimes equally convenient.

One hand has surely worked throughout the universe.

The affinities of all the beings of the same class have sometimes been represented by a great tree. I believe this simile largely speaks the truth. The green and budding twigs may represent existing species; and those produced during former years may represent the long succession of extinct species. At each period of growth all the growing twigs have tried to branch out on all sides, and to overtop and kill the surrounding twigs and branches, in the same manner as species and groups of species have at all times overmastered other species in the great battle for life. The limbs divided into great branches, and these into lesser and lesser branches, were themselves once, when the tree was young, budding twigs; and this connection of the former and present buds by ramifying branches may well represent the classification of all extinct and living species in groups subordinate to groups. Of the many twigs which flourished when the tree was a mere bush, only two or three, now grown into great branches, yet survive and bear the other branches; so with the species which lived during long-past geological periods, very few have left living and modified descendants. From the first growth of the tree, many a limb and branch has decayed and dropped off; and these fallen branches of various sizes may represent those whole orders, families, and genera which have now no living representatives, and which are known to us only in a fossil state. As we here and there see a thin straggling branch springing from a fork low down in a tree, and which by some chance has been favoured and is still alive on its summit, so we occasionally see an animal like the Ornithorhynchus or Lepidosiren, which in some small degree connects by its affinities two large branches of life, and which has apparently been saved from fatal competition by having inhabited a protected station. As buds give rise by growth to fresh buds, and these, if vigorous, branch out and overtop on all sides many a feebler branch, so by generation I believe it has been with the great Tree of Life, which fills with its dead and broken branches the crust of the earth, and covers the surface with its ever-branching and beautiful ramifications.

As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence, it follows that any being, if it vary however slightly in any manner profitable to itself, under the complex and sometimes varying conditions of life, will have a better chance of surviving, and thus be naturally selected. From the strong principle of inheritance, any selected variety will tend to propagate its new and modified form.

A grand and almost untrodden field of inquiry will be opened, on the causes and laws of variation, on correlation of growth, on the effects of use and disuse, on the direct actions of external conditions, and so forth.

To kill an error is as good a service as, and sometimes even better than, the establishing of a new truth or fact.

Freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men’s minds which follows from the advance of science.

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.

The earthquake, however, must be to every one a most impressive event: the earth, considered from our earliest childhood as the type of solidity, has oscillated like a thin crust beneath our feet; and in seeing the laboured works of man in a moment overthrown, we feel the insignificance of his boasted power.

In regard to the amount of difference between the races, we must make some allowance for our nice powers of discrimination gained by a long habit of observing ourselves.

[Alexander von Humboldt was the] greatest scientific traveller who ever lived.

Englishmen rarely cry, except under the pressure of the acutest grief; whereas in some parts of the Continent the men shed tears much more readily and freely.

Linnaeus and Cuvier have been my two gods, though in very different ways, but they were mere schoolboys to old Aristotle.

We cannot fathom the marvelous complexity of an organic being; but on the hypothesis here advanced this complexity is much increased. Each living creature must be looked at as a microcosm--a little universe, formed of a host of self-propagating organisms, inconceivably minute and as numerous as the stars in heaven.

Attention, if sudden and close, graduates into surprise; and this into astonishment; and this into stupefied amazement.

I agree with Agassiz that dogs possess something very like a conscience.

I have called the principle by which each slight variation if useful is preserved by the term of Natural Selection.

The expression often used by Mr. Herbert Spencer of the Survival of the Fittest is more accurate and is sometimes equally convenient.

Light may be shed on man and his origins.

I have called this principle by which each slight variation if useful is preserved by the term natural selection.

The expression often used by Mr. Herbert Spencer of the "Survival of the fittest" is more accurate and is sometimes equally convenient.

A man who dares to waste one hour of life has not discovered the value of life.

As for future life every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague probabilities.

The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us and I for one must be content to remain agnostic.

As for a future life every man must judge for himself between conflicting vague possibilities.

I have tried lately to read Shakespeare and found it so intolerably dull that it nauseated me.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.

False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence, do little harm, for every one takes a salutary pleasure in proving their falseness.

On the ordinary view of each species having been independently created, we gain no scientific explanation.

I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created parasitic wasps with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of Caterpillars.

An American monkey, after getting drunk on brandy, would never touch it again, and thus is much wiser than most men.

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world.

How paramount the future is to the present when one is surrounded by children. .

Comments